World Wide Christian Persecution Increasing at Alarming Rate

www.youtube.com/watch

The Scariest Movie Ever Made 2020 (Part 1)

The Scariest Movie Ever Made 2020 (Part 1)
— Read on www.bitchute.com/video/CLYznKTEE6Lq/

The UN Deceit and the New Islamic World Order

The UN Deceit and the New Islamic World Orde

Source: https://thegreatarchitect.blog/2019/05/28/the-un-and-the-new-islamic-world-order/

28th may 2019 by mario alexis portella

will-islam-dominate-america4.jpg
(Photo: theweepingeagle.com)

Muslims collectively believe, in light of their recent massive migration to the West and a much higher birthrate compared to Westerners, that they may sooner rather than later achieve their goal of an Islamic world order. In order to fulfill this, as the First Amir and Imam of Jamat e Islami Syed Abul Ala Mawdudi (1905-1979) stated: “Islam can use every power available every way it can be used to bring worldwide revolution.” Their hidden and most powerful advocate in their present-day jihad has been the United Nations Organization, which has sought to propel political Islam  at the cost of nations’ sovereignty. A recent example of this was when the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 2015had planned to vote on the historical status of Jerusalem’s Temple Mount and its associated Western Wall. According to Denis MacEoinUNESCO’s plan was to deny any Jewish link to this most central of all Jewish holy sites, to trash a history going back thousands of years, and to claim the Mount and the Wall as Islamictes.

Islam believes that it is eternal and had therefore preceded the other two monotheistic religions: Judaism and Christianity. Even though Islam only came into the global scene through the Prophet Muhammad in the seventh century AD, but was entitled to elbow out the two older religions.

Lies by UNESCO to rewrite history, erasing all traces of Judaism and Christianity to favor a jihadist Islamic fancy, were already under way in 2015. UNESCO fraudulently renamed two ancient Biblical Jewish sites, Rachel’s Tomb and the Cave of the Patriarchs Islamic sites. This was just, however, one example of how both the Islamic world, represented through the Saudi-funded Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)—the self-proclaimed voice for the Muslim world, which included 57 states, including Turkey and Palestine—has been able use the UN to employ one of its primary objectives, that of coercing Western nations to criminalize Islamophobia: to penalize any criticism, negative stereotyping, or deprecation, even if true, of Islam or the sharia. One may ask, is this the role of the United Nations?

The United Nations was historically created in reaction to World War II and the atrocities committed during the conflict so that such holistic events would not be repeated in the future. Yet from its inception the UN has sought to create a one world government at the cost of national sovereignty, human rights, especially in light that it has promoted selective human breeding through eugenics, birth control, and abortion. One of the earliest pioneers of UN global government was UNESCO’s first-ever Director-General, Sir Julian Huxley, a well-known proponent of eugenics. In his UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy (1946)he states:

“The moral task of Unesco [sic] is clear. The task is laid upon it promoting peace and security can never be wholly realised through the means assigned to it — education, science and culture. It must envisage some form of world political unity, whether through a single world government or otherwise, as the only means for avoiding war. [UNESCO] can do a great deal to lay the foundations on which world political unity can later be built.” This was actively pursued by then-President George H. Bush when he proclaimed on September 11, 1991: “a New World Order.” This new order was to be governed the UN elites and their associations, such as the International Monetary Fund, which like the UN, was fostered into existence by Soviet agents Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White. Not being able to fully achieve this, Muslims are now successfully filling in the void.

Their first global step to achieve a new world order under the sharia occurred in 1990 when the OIC declared in the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI):

“Allah … gave humanity a universal and well-balanced civilization, in which harmony [under the Islamic Sharia] is established between hereunder and the hereafter, knowledge is combined with faith, and to fulfill the expectations from this community to guide all humanity, with is confused because of different and conflicting beliefs and ideologies and to provide solutions for all chronic problems of this materialistic civilization.” In spite of this self-evident contradiction between the CDHRI and the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights published the CDHRI in December 1997, thereby seeming to give it a certain authority within the United Nations. And, sure enough, the it then became a quotable source at the United Nations.

A salient example of the OIC’s success occurred in March 2011 when the UN Rights Council passed Resolution 16/18, which called on all countries to combat “intolerance, negative stereotyping, and stigmatization of religious belief,” but stopped short of mandating criminal penalties, even though it did recognize the Muslim Brotherhood invented the concept of Islamophobia. With the backing of President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, OIC-sponsored Resolution 66/167 quietly passed the 193-member UN General Assembly on December 19, 2011. This was widely viewed a watershed toward making defamation of Islam and Islamophobia recognized legal concepts that could be criminalized, thereby giving Muslim elites more global clout.

Whether they are so-called extremists or benevolent organizations, a universal crusade on the part of Muslims to defend and impose their cultural and political identity is at hand — all one has to do is see lawmakers, such as Ilhan Omar going unchecked. This has been advanced by the Rothschilds, who control the main stream media, and their chief puppeteer, George Soros, who spends his time planting agitators in governments and manipulating animosity between Russia, the US, and Europe. They have teamed up with their fellow fascist, the ideology of Islam, to assist in destroying sovereignty. And with a capitulation of church and state leaders, it is now wonder Muslims have gotten a foothold in our society. Yes, Islamists have more than enough ammunition to establish an Islamic world order, but at the same time there is still something that can be done to stop their prevalence.

___________________________

I invite you to take a look at my book Islam: Religion of Peace? The Violation of Natural Rights and Western Cover-Up. Everything you wanted to know about Islam so as to better defend ourselves is in it!

U.N. Replacement Migration Report Issued in 2000 by U.N. Population Division for the Islamization of the World

NEW REPORT ON REPLACEMENT MIGRATION ISSUED BY UN POPULATION DIVISION
Press Release
DEV/2234
POP/735

NEW REPORT ON REPLACEMENT MIGRATION ISSUED BY UN POPULATION DIVISION 20000317

NEW YORK, 17 March (DESA) — The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) has released a new report titled “Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?”. Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to prevent population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.

United Nations projections indicate that between 1995 and 2050, the population of Japan and virtually all countries of Europe will most likely decline. In a number of cases, including Estonia, Bulgaria and Italy, countries would lose between one quarter and one third of their population. Population ageing will be pervasive, bringing the median age of population to historically unprecedented high levels. For instance, in Italy, the median age will rise from 41 years in 2000 to 53 years in 2050. The potential support ratio — i.e., the number of persons of working age (15-64 years) per older person — will often be halved, from 4 or 5 to 2.

Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the report examines in detail the case of eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). In each case, alternative scenarios for the period 1995-2050 are considered, highlighting the impact that various levels of immigration would have on population size and population ageing.

Major findings of this report include:

— In the next 50 years, the populations of most developed countries are projected to become smaller and older as a result of low fertility and increased longevity. In contrast, the population of the United States is projected to increase by almost a quarter. Among the countries studied in the report, Italy is projected to register the largest population decline in relative terms, losing 28 per cent of its population between 1995 and 2050, according to the United Nations medium variant projections. The population of the European Union, which in 1995 was larger than that of the United States by 105 million, in 2050, will become smaller by 18 million.

— Population decline is inevitable in the absence of replacement migration. Fertility may rebound in the coming decades, but few believe that it will recover sufficiently in most countries to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future.

  • 2 – Press Release DEV/2234 POP/735 17 March 2000

— Some immigration is needed to prevent population decline in all countries and regions examined in the report. However, the level of immigration in relation to past experience varies greatly. For the European Union, a continuation of the immigration levels observed in the 1990s would roughly suffice to prevent total population from declining, while for Europe as a whole, immigration would need to double. The Republic of Korea would need a relatively modest net inflow of migrants — a major change, however, for a country which has been a net sender until now. Italy and Japan would need to register notable increases in net immigration. In contrast, France, the United Kingdom and the United States would be able to maintain their total population with fewer immigrants than observed in recent years.

— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent the decline of the total population are considerably larger than those envisioned by the United Nations projections. The only exception is the United States.

— The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent declines in the working- age population are larger than those needed to prevent declines in total population. In some cases, such as the Republic of Korea, France, the United Kingdom or the United States, they are several times larger. If such flows were to occur, post-1995 immigrants and their descendants would represent a strikingly large share of the total population in 2050 — between 30 and 39 per cent in the case of Japan, Germany and Italy.

— Relative to their population size, Italy and Germany would need the largest number of migrants to maintain the size of their working-age populations. Italy would require 6,500 migrants per million inhabitants annually and Germany, 6,000. The United States would require the smallest number — 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.

— The levels of migration needed to prevent population ageing are many times larger than the migration streams needed to prevent population decline. Maintaining potential support ratios would in all cases entail volumes of immigration entirely out of line with both past experience and reasonable expectations.

— In the absence of immigration, the potential support ratios could be maintained at current levels by increasing the upper limit of the working-age population to roughly 75 years of age.

— The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require a comprehensive reassessment of many established policies and programmes, with a long-term perspective. Critical issues that need to be addressed include: (a) the appropriate ages for retirement; (b) the levels, types and nature of retirement and health care benefits for the elderly; (c) labour force participation; (d) the assessed amounts of contributions from workers and employers to support retirement and health care benefits for the elderly population; and (e) policies and programmes relating to international migration,

  • 3 – Press Release DEV/2234 POP/735 17 March 2000

in particular, replacement migration and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.

The report may be accessed on the internet site of the Population Division (http://www.un.org/esa/population/unpop.htm). Further information may be obtained from the office of Joseph Chamie, Director, Population Division, United Nations, New York, NY, 10017, USA; tel. 1-212-963-3179; fax 1-212-963-2147.