Sharia Law and its Goal to Subjugate Humanity
Last month’s uproar over Jeanine Pirro’s Fox News statements that questioned Rep. Ilhan Omar’s American allegiance—statements that got her fired from the “conservative” news network—are not going away. In her opinion segment, Pirro stated: “Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?” Needless to say, Pirro touched a delicate topic, and whenever a public figure seeks to question or point out the draconian tenets of Islam as dictated by the sharia, within which many Muslims in the West seek to auto-govern themselves, there are going to be repercussions.
The concept of self-governance under sharia law by Muslims in Western society has been a topic of controversy since the turn of the millennium, especially in light of the World Trade Center attack on September 11, 2001. Proponents of sharia in the West, under which many Muslims seek to settle personal affairs—such as divorce, custody of children and inheritance—claim it is an exercise of their freedom of religion, a human right.
YET, WHAT IS SHARIA?
Sharia literally means the “way” or “path.” Historically articulated, it is a shorthand term for an amorphous body of legal rulings, judgments and opinions, assembled over the course of many centuries after the Muslim Prophet Muhammad’s death. It is based on the Quran and a copious number of hadiths (the sayings and acts of Muhammad) developed by the fuqaha (jurists) whose opinions enjoy an almost absolute authority over the faithful.
As a rule of law, it precludes the development of human reason as it is viewed as an expression of Allah’s inscrutable will. It is this same supremacy that renders sacred and permanent the concept of inequality between the Islamic community and the non-Islamic community, between the Muslim and the non-Muslim, and between man and woman.
There are two essential weaknesses of sharia, due to which the Islamic social realm has been absorbed into the whims of the political one: its autonomy and its incompletion. As a codification of customs, it does not depend on any official body (state or clerical), and therefore there is no universal concordance on its legislation within the Islamic body politic.
Sharia thus generates a zone parallel to a political or authoritative one that can be either circumvented or manipulated by people in authority. It may therefore be said to contain law, but at the same time, it is composed of elements and aspects that are not law per se since it excludes judgement.
The problem of having sharia alongside a Western legal system is that this will eventually lead to a systematic breakdown of civil/constitutional and governmental authority and regulation over its citizens.
We must remember sharia advocates, such as the American-Palestinian activist Linda Sarsour and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), do not merely pursue concessions from government officials regarding sharia law, but rather their full and total capitulation, especially since they hold that everyone, regardless of religious affiliation falls within its jurisdiction.
As expressed by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (1990):
“Allah … gave humanity a universal and well-balanced civilization, in which harmony [under the Islamic Sharia] is established between hereunder and the hereafter, knowledge is combined with faith, and to fulfill the expectations from this community to guide all humanity, with is confused because of different and conflicting beliefs and ideologies and to provide solutions for all chronic problems of this materialistic civilization.”
Much of the pro-sharia or Islamist crusade in the West has curbed our freedom of speech, for which groups such as CAIR have, with the help of the mainstream media, gotten government officials to capitulate — church officials, especially the Catholic hierarchy have also facilitated sharia proponents in this. Part of the epidemic has been, according to what then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo addressing a church in Kansas in 2014 regarding the public adherence to Islamic (sharia) law: “This threat to America is from people who deeply believe that Islam is the way and the light and the only answer.” His ally Frank Gaffney, President of the Center for Security Policy, once argued that adherence to Islamic law—far from being protected by the First Amendment—should be considered “an impermissible act of sedition, which has to be prosecuted.”
We have a duty to defend our way of life, which is based on equity. Hence, we should even feel cornered or isolated by the sharia activists or by the dictatorship of the mainstream media. Instead, let us promote our Judaic-Christian principles: the Commandments given to us by God through Moses to be observed as our Lord Jesus Christ taught us.
N.B. This piece was originally published by the Clarion Project under the title Sharia Law: Is Its Goal To Subjugate Humanity? on November 1, 2018. Modifications were made in the first and last two paragraphs in order to concur with the current events.
I invite everyone to please take a look at my book Islam: Religion of Peace? The Violation of Natural Rights and Western Cover-Up. Everything you wanted to know about Islam and what you can do to keep it from taking over our society is in this book! Check out some of the blurbs:
Amid all the public discussion about the true nature and derivation of the global jihad threat, too little attention has been paid to the myriad ways in which Islamic law is actually not benign or good for individuals or societies, but in its pure form actively detrimental to the wellbeing of both. In this important book, Fr. Mario Alexis Portella illustrates how Sharia contravenes natural rights in numerous particulars, and causes whole classes of people (notably women and non-Muslims) lasting harm. All Catholic leaders engaged in “dialogue” with Muslims should prepare for that “dialogue” by reading and studying this book. — Robert Spencer, author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad
“If you have friends or family members who still think Islam is a religion of peace, give them this book. Mario Portella delves into the Quran, Islamic law, and the history of Islam to show that hostility toward unbelievers, and violence against them, are constants in Islamic doctrine and practice. Find out what the West has let itself in for by allowing Muslim migrants in huge numbers to settle in Western countries — read Islam – Religion of Peace?: The Violation of Natural Rights and Western Cover-up.” — Pamela Geller, author of Fatwa: Hunted In America and President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative
Rev. Mario shows us why we cannot give in to the pressures of political correctness by remaining silent in this struggle. We must shine a spotlight on extremists, recognize the challenges they pose, and fight back in the arena of ideas. — Rev. Majed El Shafie, President & Founder, OFWI.org
The new millennium ushered in a new era filled with attacks orchestrated by radical Islamists targeting our civilization. Because of the sophisticated social media methods adapted and eloquently used by the Jihadists, the brutality that the Eastern Christians endured for 14 centuries was put on display for the world to see. This savagery encouraged many Muslims to leave their faith and become secular, creating a new space for real teaching and real dialogue. This book and the message it shares is a must-read by all who are prepared to have an earnest conversation. — Juliana Taimoorazy – Founder and President of the Iraqi Christian Relief Council
The Imposition of Sharia by European Leaders is Happening in America at the Hands of U.S. Leaders
This month, the “Katie & The Wolff” Tour sweeps Texas and elsewhere as Briton Katie Hopkins and Austrian Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff share their experiences as targets of their respective government’s surrender to Islam/sharia with American audiences who are mostly unaware of how close Europe is to being overtaken by jihadis.
In the wake of the wrongful and contrived arrest/imprisonment of England’s Tommy Robinson to silence his loud and powerful voice speaking truth about the danger of Islam, these two brave women believe the best place to sound the alarm is in the United States.
As a well-known British media figure and businesswoman, Katie Hopkins speaks openly about the threat of Islam to liberty in Europe. In Europe today, however, any speech which offends muslims is not welcome and not legal.
For her truthful discussions about Islam, Hopkins was fired from her TV and radio shows, let go from her writing gigs at newspapers and other publications, and was directly threatened by jihadis trying to kill her.
While all of this unfolded, a play opened in Wales entitled, “The Assassination of Katie Hopkins” with no condemnation from the British government.
Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff is the daughter of an Austrian diplomat who lived in Iran before, during, and after the 1979 Iranian Revolution, and who found herself in Libya on 9/11/01.
Wolff began giving public presentations about the basics of Islam in her home country of Austria, including stating that Islam’s prophet Mohammad married Aisha when she was six years old, which conforms with doctrinal Islamic teaching.
In 2009, Sabaditsch-Wolff was convicted in an Austrian court for “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion,” in violation of Section 188 of the Austrian Criminal Code.
The conviction was upheld by an Austrian appellate court in 2011.
The Austrian courts ruled Sabaditsch-Wolff’s comments are “an abusive attack on the Prophet of Islam which could stir up prejudice and threaten religious peace,” which, by the way, is not consistent with centuries of Western law and a reasoned understanding of justice.
The court ordered Sabaditsch-Wolff to pay a fine of €480 ($625) or an alternative sentence of 60 days in prison.
In October 2018, a seven-judge panel of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) concluded the Austrian courts “carefully balanced the applicant’s right to freedom of expression with the rights of others to have their religious feelings protected...”
In other words, the Austrian courts, as well as the European Court of Human Rights, are imposing the Islamic Law of Slander upon Europeans.
In sharia, “Slander” is legally defined as saying/communicating anything about Islam a muslim would “dislike,” and it is a capital crime.
For more about sharia, get a copy of UTT’s 2-DVD set “It’s All About Sharia” by clicking HERE.
The European Court has adopted the Islamic legal definition of “Human Rights” as defined by the Islamic world under the banner of the OIC (Organisation of Islamic Cooperation). The OIC approved and served the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam to the United Nations in 1993. In it, the entire muslim world at the Head of State and King level defines “human rights” as the imposition of sharia.
The leaders of Europe are doing the jihadis bidding for them by imposing Islamic Law (sharia) on Europeans. This is what the Muslim Brotherhood calls “civilization jihad by their hands.”
This past week, leaders in Fort Worth, Texas held a prayer vigil with Hamas/Muslim Brotherhood leaders at the Islamic Association of Tarrant County, exemplifying the ease at which jihadis are able to get U.S. leaders to submit to them just as leaders are submitting to suit-wearing jihadis in Europe.
Most notably, Governor Tim Walz of Minnesota supported and defended – or more accurately “aided and abetted” – Hamas terrorists doing business as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), by speaking at a CAIR event in Minnesota several days ago.
Governor Walz called for an end to “Islamophobia,” a word created by the Muslim Brotherhood’s International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) to be used to impose the Islamic Law of Slander on the non-muslim community.
Right now American leaders – with their co-conspirators in the media – are imposing sharia and condemning free speech on U.S. citizens.
America stands at the precipice of U.S. judges, courts, and leaders putting Americans in jail for speaking truth about Islam’s barbaric law called sharia.
The war for liberty is happening NOW.
Every time a mayor, police chief, congressman, senator, pastor, rabbi, or National Security Advisor, panders to the Islamic community, and gives in to their demands for “religious accommodation,” they are, in fact, surrendering one more foot of ground to sharia – a system that stands in direct opposition to liberty, America’s founding principles, and U.S. federal and state laws.
Want to get in the fight? Join UTT! UnderstandingtheThreat.comJGUTTAisha, Austria, CAIR, caliphate, Council on American Islamic Relations, Court, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, England, Europe, European Court of Human Rights, fort worth, Hamas, Iran, Iranian Revolution, Islamic Association of Tarrant County, islamic State, jihad, Katie Hopkins, Minnesota, Muslim Brotherhood, shari’ah, sharia, terrorism, Tim Walz, Wales
About JGJohn Guandolo is a US Naval Academy graduate, served as an Infantry/Reconnaissance officer in the United States Marines and is a combat veteran, served as a Special Agent in the FBI from 1996-2008, and was recruited out of the FBI by the Department of Defense to conduct strategic analysis of the Islamic threat. He is the President and Founder of Understanding the Threat (UTT).
Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Fox Condemns Pirro for Asking if Omar is Pro-Sharia
The fair and balanced network is now as unfair and unbalanced as the rest of them. My latest in FrontPage:
Breitbart reported Monday that the Fox News Channel “condemned host Jeanine Pirro’s remarks on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) use of a hijab and said the issue has been dealt with directly.” Sounds serious. But what Pirro actually said was something Fox should have been applauding, if it hadn’t already become just another establishment network.
Pirro said: “Think about this: She’s not getting this anti-Israel sentiment doctrine from the Democrat Party. So if it’s not rooted in the party, where is she getting it from? Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?”
Predictably, the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) called on Fox to fire Pirro. Like a shark, CAIR can smell blood in the water: instead of defending Pirro for asking a perfectly legitimate question, Fox immediately reacted as if Pirro had stolen Barack Obama’s parking space, denouncing Pirro’s words with stern self-righteousness: “We strongly condemn Jeanine Pirro’s comments about Rep. IlhanOmar. They do not reflect those of the network and we have addressed the matter with her directly.”
Pirro, issued a clarification, to little effect: “I’ve seen a lot of comments about my opening statement from Saturday night’s show and I did not call Rep. Omar un-American. My intention was to ask a question and start a debate, but of course because one is Muslim does not mean you don’t support the Constitution. I invite Rep. Omar to come on my show any time to discuss all of the important issues facing America today.”
Fox is increasingly slipping into the Leftist echo chamber. It is terrified of discussing these issues. A few years ago, Jeanine Pirro contacted me and was going to have me as a featured guest on a special show about Sharia. She was very excited about it, and all the arrangements were made to fly me in and get me set up in the studio. Then at the last minute, everything was canceled — it was clear that Fox executives had told her she was venturing into forbidden territory. They willingly kowtow to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s defamation campaign targeting foes of jihad terror and Sharia oppression of women and others. But last night, Pirro ventured off the reservation again, daring to suggest that Ilhan Omar’s hijab showed her to be Sharia-compliant.
There is so much confusion on this issue, even among people who should know better. Media critic John Nolte tweeted: “Does a Jewish man who covers his head put the Torah above the Constitution? Does a Catholic woman who covers head put the Pope above the Constitution? What a stupid thing to say.”
No in both cases, because in both cases the headwear in question is not part of a larger system that is incompatible with Constitutional rule. However, the hijab is part of such a system, and that’s all Pirro was saying. Fox should not have rebuked her, but this is the age of pandemic cowardice, so it was likely unrealistic to expect anything else.
Ilhan Omar herself, not surprisingly, was happier with Fox News than she has probably ever been, and tweeted: “Thank you, @FoxNews. No one’s commitment to our constitution should be questioned because of their faith or country of birth.”
But that wasn’t really what Pirro did. Pirro suggested that Omar’s anti-Semitism came from Sharia. And indeed, Sharia is indeed inveterately anti-Semitic: the Qur’an demonizes the Jews in numerous ways. It depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).
Sharia also mandates that women cover their heads:
“And tell the believing women to reduce their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which appears thereof and to wrap their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.” (Qur’an 24:31)
“O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (Qur’an 33:59)
“Narrated `Aisha (the wife of the Prophet): `Umar bin Al-Khattab used to say to Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) “Let your wives be veiled” But he did not do so. The wives of the Prophet (ﷺ) used to go out to answer the call of nature at night only at Al-Manasi.’ Once Sauda, the daughter of Zam`a went out and she was a tall woman. `Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her while he was in a gathering, and said, ‘I have recognized you, O Sauda!’ He (`Umar) said so as he was anxious for some Divine orders regarding the veil (the veiling of women.) So Allah revealed the Verse of veiling. (Al-Hijab; a complete body cover excluding the eyes).” (Bukhari 79.14.6420)
Wearing hijab is a sign that one accepts these imperatives. That is not necessarily true, as lots of women of all perspectives wear headscarves, but when a Muslim woman wears hijab, it’s reasonable to surmise that she accepts the Qur’an and Sunnah, the sources of Sharia. Sharia denies the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, the equality of rights of women, and the equality of rights of non-Muslims. Wearing hijab is a sign of adherence to Sharia.
So what did Judge Jeanine Pirro say that was wrong about Ilhan Omar? She asked questions that need to be asked. Fox should be apologizing to Pirro, not Omar.
Judge Jeanine on hijab wearing Islamic Sharia Law Congress Woman Ilhan Omar & USA Constitution
US offers $1 million Bounty in Hunt for Osama bin Laden’s Son Hamza
With ISIS nearly wiped out, it’s time to resuscitate al Qaeda. Source: Hamza bin Laden: US offers $1 million bounty in hunt for bin Laden’s son – CBS News
Eight years after a Navy SEAL team shot and killed Osama bin Laden, the U.S. government is offering $1 million for help tracking down the son of the Sept. 11 mastermind. The State Department announced Thursday it would give out the reward for help locating Hamza bin Laden.
“He has released audio and video messages on the Internet, calling on his followers to launch attacks against the United States and its Western allies, and he has threatened attacks against the United States in revenge for the May 2011 killing of his father by U.S. military forces,” the State Department said.
WANTED. Up to $1 million for information on Hamza bin Laden, an emerging al-Qa’ida leader. Hamza is son of Usama bin Laden and has threatened attacks against the United States and allies. Relocation possible. Submit a tip, get paid. https://t.co/LtBVhsrwTc #RFJpic.twitter.com/gmx5hkoSzQ
— Rewards for Justice (@Rewards4Justice) February 28, 2019
In 2017, the State Department added Hamza bin Laden to its Specially Designated Global Terrorist list after he was “determined to have committed, or pose a serious risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security.”
The U.S. also said that Hamza bin Laden married the daughter of Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker in the 9/11 attacks. This fact was initially reported by Guardian journalist Martin Chulov, who interviewed Osama bin Laden’s family last summer.
“So what [the family] would say is that 9/11 alumni remains very viable and very real even 17 years after the fact,” Chulov told CBSN in August.
Chulov said that while there has been speculation that Hamza bin Laden is in Pakistan, he believes it is more likely that he is in Afghanistan.
Hamza bin Laden is the son of deceased former al-Qa’ida leader Usama bin Laden and is emerging as a leader in the al-Qa’ida franchise. He has released audio and video messages on the Internet, calling on his followers to launch attacks against the United States and its Western allies.The U.S. government is offering rewards for information about Hamza bin Laden. Absolute confidentiality is assured and relocation may be available. If you have information, please contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate or email@example.com.
Hamza married the daughter of Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker and a mastermind of al-Qa’ida’s September 2001 airline terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Usama bin Laden’s letters seized from the Abbottabad, Pakistan compound where bin Laden was killed indicate that he was grooming Hamza to replace him as leader of al-Qa’ida.
The United Nations Security Council added Hamza bin Laden to its sanctions list on Thursday. He is subject to an assets freeze and travel ban. Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry announced on Friday that it was stripping him of his Saudi nationality.
The United Nations Security Council added Hamza bin Laden to its sanctions list on Thursday. He is subject to an assets freeze and travel ban. Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry announced on Friday that it was stripping him of his Saudi nationality.
Two years ago the CIA released a massive trove of files that were found on a computer in Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Audio and video footage included with these documents appeared to indicate that Hamza bin Laden’s wedding was held in Iran, according to an analysis by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a think tank based in Washington, D.C.
Michael Evanoff, an assistant secretary for diplomatic security at the State Department, said that while Hamza bin Laden is likely hiding near the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan, he may try to cross into Iran or even head toward south central Asia.
“He could be anywhere, though,” he said in a Thursday news briefing.
Saudi Arabia announced Friday it had revoked the citizenship of Hamza bin Laden, the son of the late al-Qaida leader who has become an increasingly prominent figure in the terror network.
Saudi Arabia revoked Hamza bin Laden’s citizenship in November, according to a circular by the Interior Ministry quietly published Friday by the country’s official gazette. State-run media in the kingdom did not report on the decision.
Muslim Demographic Project
Muslim Workers Sue UPS For Discrimination
A lawsuit was filed by the Council on American-Islamic Relations on behalf of two Muslim workers against a Minnesota UPS branch after the employees were reportedly fired for needing to pray during the workday.
The lawsuit alleged the Atlanta-based company, as well as the Edina, Minnesota, staffing company Doherty Staffing Services, discriminated against several of its Muslim employees and violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, KAAL reported.
The workers claimed in the suit that before June 2014, they were allowed to engage in daily prayer outside of their breaks and during work hours. When a new operations manager took over, that policy changed. The new manager reportedly asked employees in a meeting to raise their hands if they wanted to pray.
“After most Muslim employees raised their hands, (the operations manager) stated that he wanted to replace all of the employees who had raised their hands,” the suit stated.
The employees claimed they were given one option if they wanted to pray during the day: They would have to leave and go home. They were also told that if they left, they would not be allowed to return.
“In general, most employees, when this happens, they just walk away,” Amir Malik, an attorney for CAIR, told KAAL. “They don’t complain, they don’t know their rights, they’re just trying to put food on the table, and companies feel they can get away with this. And we’ve seen multiple cases of this and it focuses a lot on low-skill jobs where they think that people don’t know their rights and they can be abused.”
UPS later issued a statement stating that they investigated and found no evidence to support the workers’ claims:
Both UPS and Doherty Staffing Services, a company that employs and manages the workforce at the UPS Mail Innovations facility in Mendota Heights, thoroughly investigated and found no evidence to support these allegations. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission also found no cause for claims against UPS and dismissed the allegations.
Many readers criticized the workers for suing the company over their right to pray.
“Prayer for what?” one reader commented on the site’s Facebook page. “Simply wanting to disrupt the system that works to keep America going. That is their only objective; if I had to pray 5 times a day for no results, I’d find a new religion that works with the system that provides life for my family. They’d rather sue the employer and have a liberal judge give them a life’s pension.”
“It would seem to me that employers would have a letter of understanding on the subject of breaks and the responsible of the employees to adhere the the rules of of the employer and have the applicants sign it as a condition of employment,” another wrote.
“I guess maybe all Christians sometime are having a special problem in their life and might be at work and want to say a prayer,” another added. “I always know I can pray wherever I am I can pray silently to God and He hears me. I don’t have to go take a shower or be on my knees to pray. My God is not deaf or require a ritual before He will hear my prayer.”
Intro to ‘Muslim Invasion: GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA’
© February 15, 2019
Rose sent this to me via Facebook Messenger. This is a chain email. Chain emails are notorious for degrees of stretching the truth to downright just deceiving. The object is to spread the message of the chain email to as many readers as possible. Depending on the intended goal of a chain email, a carrot or a stick is employed to spur on chain email dissemination. A carrot might read something like: Send this to five people and God will bless you with prosperity. A stick may look like: If you read this, you must send this to five people or your life will be cursed with misery. OR a neutral carrot as in the chain email I’m about to share that reads: “Please Pass This On or Not!”
As a rule, I NEVER pass on chain emails. But if I read one that bugs me, I enjoy exposing it. AND if I read one that has an element of truth, but has stretched or a little distorted facts – I like to show the better reality. Such is the case of a Chain Email sent to me via Facebook Messenger by a Facebook friend.
The theme of this Chain Email is that the growing Muslim population via migrants, refugees, immigrants and birth is Islamizing the United Kingdom. The truth is Britain’s Multiculturalist Left is so bent on accommodating its growing Muslim population that Islamic Culture is harming the Judeo-Christian-Western foundations of the United Kingdom’s original population. Think about it! The UK still has an Established Church and yet it is a hate-crime for a British Christian to defend their faith from Islamic doctrines contrary to Christian doctrines in public writings or public speech. Why? Such a Christian defense might (ACTUALLY PROBABLY) will insult a Muslim’s faith. AND by observation we know how significant Muslim populations react when they sense insult by non-Muslims. THEY RIOT, RAMPAGE and in some cases embark on murder or rape (mere examples).
Below is the Chain Email with my commentary in bold text.
Your generosity is always appreciated:
[Muslim Invasion:] GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA
Posted by Rose Reed Brown
Via Facebook Messenger
So, England doesn’t like the US recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel! Imagine that!
I thought this might give you a better understanding of the insidiousness of Hegira [Blog Editor: Islamizing Medina – 620 – 622 AD AND Hegira-Jihad Emigration]; that’s the takeover of a nation without going to war. Don’t think for a moment that America is not a target or that there are no American cities where Islamic and Sharia victories and takeovers have already occurred. It’s time for border control, or start planning for a very big goodbye to the American way of life!
Here’s what has already happened to England within a few years of opening their borders without any entry control:
How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:
Mayor of London … MUSLIM [Sadiq Khan 2016-Present]
Mayor of Leeds … MUSLIM [Mohammed Iqbal will be the 113th Lord Mayor of Leeds (2006)]
Mayor of Blackburn … MUSLIM [Salas R. Kiani (1999-2000), Yusuf Jan-Virmani (2005-06), Mohammed Khan (2008-09) and Zamir Khan (2012-13)]
Mayor of Sheffield … MUSLIM [Magid Magid (2018 – Present)]
Mayor of Oxford .. MUSLIM [Mohammed Abbasi (2014-15) and Mohammed Altaf-Khan (2016-17)]
Mayor of Luton [List Doc Download] …. MUSLIM [Mukunda Bhusan Guha (1991–92), Mohammed Ashraf (1995–96), Masood Akhtar (1997–98), Raja Mohammed Saleem (1999-2000 & 2002-03), Waheed Akbar (2000-01), Kazi Haji Abid Hussain (2005–06), Lakhbir Singh (2008–09), Mohammed Riaz Butt (2009–10), Mohammed Farooq (2014–15), Tahir Khan (2016–17) and Naseem Ayub (2018-Present)]
Mayor of Oldham … MUSLIM [Riaz Ahmad (2002-03), Abdul Jabbar (2005-05), Shoab Akhtar (2008-09), Fida Hussain (2014-15), Ateeque Ur-Rehman (2015-16), Shadab Qumer (2017-18) and Javid Iqbal (2018-Present)]
All the following achieved by just 4 million Muslims [According to gov.ukin 2018: 3,372,966] out of the 66 million population:
Over 3,000 Muslim Mosques [According to Daily Mail 2018: 1500 Mosques]
Over 50 Muslim Sharia Councils [The best I could determine, a Sharia Court and a Sharia Council are one and the same. Quote from news.co.uk:
“Controversial Sharia councils or courts, how they fit in with the British legal system and how they treat women, are at the centre of two Government inquiries.”]
Muslims Only No-Go Areas Across The UK [Gatestone Institute (2/3/15) definition: “No-go zones can be defined as Muslim-dominated neighborhoods that are de facto off limits to non-Muslims due to a number of factors, including the lawlessness, insecurity or religious intimidation that often pervades these areas.” There are no government cordoned off as a No-Go Zone, rather the designation is by word of mouth based on non-Muslim fear. Here is a list provided by the same Gatestone Institute:
Birmingham: Bordesley Green (includes Small Heath) (73.9%); Hodge Hill (includes areas of Saltley and Ward End) (41.5%); Ladywood (35.2%); Lozells and East Handsworth (48.9%); Nechells (43.5%); Sparkbrook (includes Sparkhill) (70.2%); Washwood Heath (includes Alum Rock) (77.3%).
Blackburn with Darwen: Audley (68.7%); Bastwell (85.3%); Corporation Park (62.6%); Little Harwood (51.9%); Queen’s Park (51.5%); Shear Brow (77.7%); Wensley Fold (39.8%)
Bolton (Greater Manchester): Crompton (32.7 %); Great Lever (36.6%); Halliwell (27.9%); Rumworth (51.8%)
Bradford (West Yorkshire): Bowling and Barkerend (45.8%); Bradford Moor (72.8%); City (57.3%); Great Horton (42.8%); Heaton (55.9%); Keighley Central (51.2%); Little Horton (58.0%); Manningham (75.0%); Toller (76.1%)
Brent: Barnhill (23.3%); Dollis Hill (31.3%); Dudden Hill (23.5%); Harlesden (21.8%); Stonebridge (28.2%)
Dewsbury (West Yorkshire): Dewsbury South (including Savile Town) (43.8%); Dewsbury West (46.7%)
Leeds: Gipton and Harehills (33.2%)
Leicester: Charnwood (38.7%); Coleman (39.7%); Spinney Hills (69.6%); Stoneygate (50.2%)
London Borough of Enfield: Edmonton Green (29.1%); Haselbury (25.7%); Jubilee (24.1%); Lower Edmonton (24.1%); Ponders End (29.0%); Upper Edmonton (26.4%)
London Borough of Tower Hamlets: Bethnal Green South (45.7%); Bromley-by-Bow (48.7%); East India and Lansbury (42.9%); Limehouse (35.5%); Mile End and Globe Town (34.3%); Mile End East (45.9%); Shadwell (46.7%); Spitalfields and Banglatown (38.6%); St Dunstan’s and Stepney Green (48.7%); Weavers (30.3%); and Whitechapel (42.4%).
London Borough of Newham: Boleyn (40.5%); East Ham Central (39.6%); East Ham North (50.1%); Green Street East (49.1%); Green Street West (50.4%); Little Ilford (44.8%); Manor Park (45.4%); Wall End (33.9%)
London Borough of Redbridge: Clementswood (42.7%); Cranbrook (36.6%); Goodmayes (33.5%); Loxford (46.0%); Mayfield (34.6%); Newbury (29.4%); Seven Kings (31.3%); Valentines (40.0%)
London Borough of Waltham Forest: Forest (31.9%); Lea Bridge (32.3%); Leyton (30.2%); Markhouse (32.4%)
Luton: Biscot (64.6%); Dallow (includes parts of Bury Park) (61.6%); Saints (51.1%)
Manchester: Cheetham (43.3%); Longsight (53.8%); Rusholme (37.9%); Whalley Range (32.7%)
Oldham: Coldhurst (64.2%); Medlock Vale (32.3%); St Mary’s (58.7%); Werneth (68.2%)
Pendle: Bradley (45.7%); Brierfield (38.8%); Walverden (47.1%); Whitefield (69.8%)
Rochdale: Central Rochdale (52.4%); Milkstone and Deeplish (67.1%)
Slough: Baylis and Stoke (44.7%); Central (40.6%); Chalvey (37.2%)
Westminster: Church Street (42.0%); Harrow Road (24.1%); Hyde Park (25.1%); Queen’s Park (26.3%); Westbourne (33.1%)
Wycombe: Bowerdean (35.6%); Oakridge and Castlefield (45.7%)]
[Blog Editor: I cannot confirm any of the statistics below. Knowing chain emails my suspicion is at best inaccurate and at worst fabricated to support the actual culture clash that indeed exists between Western Culture and Islamic Culture. Here’s a quote from a EuroNews title, “Which European countries offer the most social benefits to migrants?” The date 9/16/15. Scroll down to “UNITEDKINGDOM”:
- Accommodation tends to be private, paid for by the state.
- Weekly allowance of 36.95 pounds (50.35 euros) per person to cover basic needs including food. Small extra amounts available for pregnant women, babies and young children.
- Not normally allowed to work.
- If granted asylum: same benefits as British nationals.]
Muslim Women…78% don’t work and are on FREE benefits/housing
Muslim Men…63% don’t work and are on FREE benefits/housing
[Blog Editor: It is my humble opinion that most Fact Checking websites are too Left Wing to be reliable in fact checking Conservative perspectives (of which Snopes – but limited to – is among the worst). The most even handed Fact Checking website in my opinion is Truth Or Fiction. Incidentally, Truth Or Fiction (TOF) places this Chain Email and its numerous variations as “Mostly Fiction” yet with some truth. TOF quotes the BBC on Muslim unemployment in relation the “Muslim Invasion” Muslim stats in the Chain Email:
… And it’s not clear where the Muslim Invasion email’s claims that 78% of Muslim women don’t work, and that 63% of Muslim men don’t work and receive government benefits like housing assistance. Research shows that those claims are incorrect — but U.K. Muslims are generally worse-off economically than other groups. Forty-six percent of Muslims live in the bottom 1o% of local authority districts that are considered “most depraved.” Additionally, employment rates are higher among Muslims than other religious groups, but not as high as the Muslim Invasion email claims, a 2015 study found:
One of the areas of concern the report highlights is how well these qualifications turn into employment, particularly for females. 29% of Muslim women between the ages of 16 and 24 are in employment, compared to approximately half the general population. For the ages group 25 – 49 the numbers show 57% of Muslim women in employment compared with 80% of women overall.
This raises a number of questions that were posed at the report’s launch as areas that need extra exploration – why are educated Muslim woman not carrying on into employment? Possible reasons cited being cultural influences encouraging them to have a family and stay at home, racism and prejudice in the workplace and/or their qualifications not being from institutions of a high enough standard to appeal to employers. The report notes that Muslim students are less likely to attend Russell Group universities.
TOS does not specifically address the full free benefits unemployed Muslims receive in the claims of the Chain Email. According to Britannica.com all legal residents in the UK (i.e. citizens and non-citizens) receive the same benefits (this would include Muslims):
The National Health Service (NHS) provides comprehensive health care throughout the United Kingdom. The NHS provides medical care through a tripartite structure of primary care, hospitals, and community health care. The main element in primary care is the system of general practitioners (family doctors), who provide preventive and curative care and who refer patients to hospital and specialist services. All consultations with a general practitioner under the NHS are free.
The other major types of primary medical care are dentistry and pharmaceutical and opthalmic services. These are the only services of the NHS for which charges are levied, though persons under age 16, past retirement, or with low incomes are usually exempt. Everyone else must pay charges that are below the full cost of the services involved.
… Employers collect the contribution, and there is also an employer contribution. Separate arrangements exist for the self-employed. The revenue from contributions goes into the National Insurance Fund.
Insured individuals are entitled to unemployment compensation, cash benefits during sickness or disability, and a retirement pension. There are also benefits for individuals injured in work-related accidents and for widows. Whether or not they receive an insurance benefit, all are eligible for a noncontributory benefit. Employees who lose their jobs through no fault of their own receive lump-sum redundancy, or severance, payments, whose cost is met in part by their employers and in part from a general levy on employers.
The major noncontributory benefits, paid out of general tax revenues, offer poverty relief to individuals and families whose income and savings fall below some prescribed level. The benefit of last resort is income support (formerly called the supplementary benefit); it is payable to individuals whose entitlement to insurance benefits has been exhausted or has left them with a very low income and to those who never had any entitlement to an insurance benefit. Other means-tested benefits assist low-paid working families with children and help people on low incomes with their housing costs. An important class of noncontributory benefits is not means-tested, the major example being the child benefit, a weekly tax-free payment for each child, usually payable to the mother.
… The government also introduced a children’s tax credit to provide additional support to low- and middle-income families. There was a review of the benefit system in 1985 that changed the detailed workings of several benefits in 1988 but left the basic structure intact.
During the mid-20th century, local governments developed council houses (public housing estates) throughout the United Kingdom. At public housing’s peak, about 1970, local governments owned 30 percent of all housing in the country. Under the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act of 1977 (which amended older legislation), local governments have a statutory obligation in certain circumstances to find housing for homeless families. Partly for that reason, they keep a substantial stock of housing for rent, maintain waiting lists, and allocate housing according to need…
Primary and secondary education
Primary education is free and compulsory from age 5 to 11. Secondary education is organized in a variety of ways for children aged 11 to 19 and is free and compulsory to age 16. In most parts of the United Kingdom, secondary schools are comprehensive; that is, they are open to pupils of all abilities. Pupils may stay on past the minimum school-leaving age of 16 to earn a certificate or take public examinations that qualify them for higher education.
The state finances primary and secondary education out of central and local tax revenues. Most expenditures take place at the local level, though about half of local revenues derive from the central government.]
Muslim Families…6-8 children planning to go on FREE benefits/housing and now all UK schools are ONLY serving HALAL MEAT!
[Blog Editor: Most Fact Checkers debunk the “ONLY,” but that doesn’t mean a substantial amount of UK Public Schools do not serve Islamic ceremonial halal meat even to non-Muslims. Here’s an excerpt from an interesting article on halal meat in UK Public Schools from ParentPower.family examining European Human Rights in relation to halal meat in UK Public Schools (9/10/18):
In July of this year, Lancashire Council became the first in the UK to ban unstunned halal meat from being served in schools. Not all providers of halal meat will not stun the animal prior to slaughter, but The Lancashire Council of Mosques argued that the halal slaughter process “must avoid all forms of stunning.” In addition, “the slaughterman must personally invoke the name of Allah prior to every slaughter.”
A freedom of information request to Liverpool Council in 2010 asked how many schools served halal meat in the Liverpool council area. The Council responded by saying that they did not hold this information centrally. This lack of central information means that nobody knows how many schools are serving halal meat in their canteens. There are certainly schools that only serve halal meat, whilst offering vegetarian alternatives. In some cases parents have not been informed that their children are eating halal meat. One school abandoned plans to serve only halal meat just hours after sending letters announcing the plan after parents complained.
Animal welfare is one reason why parents might want to object to halal meat in schools. Halal slaughter is also a religious sacrifice to Allah which means that some parents will have religious objections.
Friends that’s way TOO MUCH Islamic influence in a Western Culture nation that serving Islamic ceremonial halal meat is even a consideration. Especially since Islamic revered writings condemn non-Muslims (Christians and Jews by name – the “People of the Book” respect is abrogated by the Quran attributed Muhammad’s Medina-recited surahs) as insulting infidels (aka kafir) if they do not submit to the superiority of Allah and Islam.]
…and we (the USA) and (CANADA) can’t decide on an immigration policy???
Read all of this and pass on. This can’t happen to us. Whatever it takes, we got to band together. Deport ALL MUSLIMS.
One of the ways to combat this is to keep circulating information such as this e-mail around our United States and Canada to inform the uninformed who mainly only listen and read the left leaning US and Canadian radio/TV and newspapers. I have not seen this in the US or Canadian media…have you?
Please Pass This On or Not!
Intro to ‘Muslim Invasion: GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA’
By John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© February 15, 2019
[Muslim Invasion:] GOOD BYE ENGLAND Lookout USA
Chain Email shared by Rose on Facebook Messenger.
Edited by John R. Houk with commentary
on Dec 9, 2018
A new Android app has launched with the focus of allowing Muslims to report individuals who commit blasphemy, or insult Islam.
No, this is not a joke. The app, “Smart Pakem”, which launched in Indonesia last month at the request of the Indonesian government, will allow users and government officials to uphold Sharia law and target and report people who hold “misguided” beliefs in violation of Islamic law, which forbids insults of Islam, insults against the Prophet Mohammed, or the recognition of any other religion besides Islam.
Indonesia is the largest Muslim country in the world, with an estimated Muslim population of 207 million.T
Indonesia’s criminal code prohibits blasphemy, which is defined as “the act or offense of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things”.
The Code’s Article 156(a) targets those who deliberately, in public, “express feelings of hostility, hatred, or contempt against religion”. The penalty for violating Article 156(a) of Indonesia’s criminal code is a maximum of five years imprisonment.
Rajan Anandan, who serves as the VP of Google in south-east Asia, has not shown any resistance to the app, which is available in the Google app store.
The National Secular Society (NSS) has since written to Anadan requesting the Google not stock the app in the app store, arguing that the app will have negative consequences for religious minorities and will further minimize freedom of expression.
According to Human Rights Watch, 125 people were convicted of blasphemy in Indonesia between 2004 and 2014. 23 additional people have been convicted since 2014.
Stephen Evans, who serves as the chief executive of NSS said said Google’s decision to stock the Sharia app was “incongruous with Google’s mission statement” and “runs directly contrary to the democratic ideals which Google says it stands for”. Evans also said the app will “normalize restrictions on freedom of expression in Indonesia and elsewhere”.
“Indonesia’s blasphemy law is a morally unjustifiable tool of repression which should be repealed as soon as possible. While this law exists anyone who believes in free expression should make it as difficult as possible for the Indonesian government to enforce the law. Google has greatly benefited from the freedom to share information globally. We ask it and other multinational companies to consider whether they can in good conscience profit from the repression caused by governments’ crackdowns on free speech.”
Since the app’s launch in the Google app store, it has been flooded with one star reviews and criticisms by anti-Sharia and human rights advocates.
On November 29, 2018, investigative journalist Laura Loomer handcuffed herself to Twitter HQ in NYC after she was banned from Twitter for criticizing Sharia law. While handcuffed, Loomer argued “Twitter, Facebook, Apple, Google, Instagram, they are essentially upholding Sharia. Silicon Valley is essentially upholding Sharia when they decide to ban me for posting facts about Islam, when they decide to ban me for posting facts about Sharia law and criticizing an anti-Jewish Muslim Congresswoman.”
Read More about Silicon Valley Sharia here.
Laura Loomer is a conservative investigative journalist and activist. Originally from Arizona, Laura began her career working as an undercover journalist for Project Veritas from 2015-2017. She covers politics, anti-Semitism, immigration, terrorism, the Islamification of the West, and voter fraud. Loomer’s investigations have been broadcasted on every major national mainstream media outlet in the United States, as well as many international publications. Support Laura Loomer’s Independent Journalism here: PayPal.me/lauraloomerPatreon.com/lauraloomerSubscribe to lauraloomer.us today.Follow Laura Loomer on Facebook.
Follow Laura Loomer on Instagram.