Estonia’s new govt ministers join populist revolt, oppose “national suicide through immigration”

Estonia’s new govt ministers join populist revolt, oppose “national suicide through immigration”

MAY 21, 2019 8:30 AM BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS6 COMMENTS

The leader of the Estonian Conservative People’s Party, Martin Helme, “recently joined a new coalition government in the Baltic country following a populist breakthrough in national elections”. Now, he is vowing to “oppose further centralisation in the European Union.”

Helme’s vigorous determination echoes that of Hungarian leader Viktor Orban, who President Trump has referred to as his “twin brother“. Orban has just declared his determination to shift the EU, stating: “We Want Change, We Want a Europe that Protects Its Borders on Land and Sea”.

Similarly, Martin Helme has now declared that he will oppose the globalist EU’s integration of member states, focusing instead on the sovereignty of individual states . Helme said: “I am not a racist. People who refuse to participate in collective national suicide through immigration are labelled racist”.

Populist Revolt Spreads: Estonia’s New Govt Ministers Will Oppose EU Integration”, by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, May 20, 2019:

The leader of the Estonian Conservative People’s Party (EKRE), who recently joined a new coalition government in the Baltic country following a populist breakthrough in national elections, has vowed to oppose further centralisation in the European Union.

“I don’t see a reason for ‘ever closer union’ and I don’t support deeper integration in the EU in general,” said Martin Helme, who campaigned against Estonia’s accession to the bloc in the early 2000s.

“We should first do what we have agreed and not focus on finding new ways of integration or deepening integration,” added the 43-year-old, who serves as Minister of Finance in the new government, alongside EKRE chairman and founder Mart Helme — his father — as Minister of the Interior.

EKRE’s elevation to the Estonian government is another brick out of the wall for the so-called European project, aimed at gradually integrating the member-states of the European Union along federal lines, similar to the United States of America.

Left-neoliberal commentators experienced particular consternation when the Helmes threw up Trump-style “OK” hand signs when they were sworn into office — as much of the mainstream media have been successfully trolled into believing that it is a covert signal for “white power” by users of the 4chan image board.

Martin Helme told Britain’s Financial Times he would continue to use the gesture as a sign of defiance to “left-wing radicals who want to hijack language.”……

Muslim “Journalist” in UK blames Geert Wilders for Utrecht Jihad massacre

Muslim “Journalist” in UK blames Geert Wilders for Utrecht Jihad MMuslim “journalist” in UK blames Geert Wilders for Utrecht jihad massacre

Many UK MSM journalists won’t know – since Geert Wilders spread Islamophobia across the Netherlands like a wildfire, Utrecht has been the centre of a number of PEGIDA riots and demonstrations against mosques and Muslim migration. #MuslimLivesMatter pic.twitter.com/HvYL8FDyd8— Mo Ansar (@MoAnsar) March 18, 2019

Netherlands: Converts to Christianity from Islam Get Threats “Every Single Day”

Netherlands: Converts to Christianity from Islam Get Threats “Every Single Day”

MAR 14, 2019 3:00 PM BY ROBERT SPENCER24 COMMENTS

Welcome to the new, multicultural Netherlands. This is a direct result of mass Muslim migration into Europe. Nor will these converts be able to rest easy anytime soon. The death penalty for apostasy is part of Islamic law. It’s based on the Qur’an: “They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper.” (Qur’an 4:89)

A hadith depicts Muhammad saying: “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him” (Bukhari 9.84.57). The death penalty for apostasy is part of Islamic law according to all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence.

This is still the position of all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence, both Sunni and Shi’ite. Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the most renowned and prominent Muslim cleric in the world, has stated: “The Muslim jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-‘ashriyyah, Al-Ja’fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed.”

Qaradawi also once famously said: “If they had gotten rid of the apostasy punishment, Islam wouldn’t exist today.”

“Muslim-turned-Christian refugees in the Netherlands face threats,” by Sjoukje Dijkstra, Crux, March 14, 2019:

Christian relief organizations in the Netherlands recently raised the alarm about the fact that Christian refugees in the country are being threatened or bullied on a regular basis, especially when they used to be Muslim. Three of these refugees were willing to share their story.

Faradoun Fouad: ‘I’m still getting threats every single day’

Faraidoun Fouad fled Kurdistan in northern Iraq. Once safely arrived in the Netherlands, he came into contact with Christianity.

“I converted in 1999,” he said. “In 2002 God called me to reach out to my own people. Directly after my conversion to Christianity I received the first threats. People who I thought were my friends, became my enemies.”…

“Even Muslims who are not very conservative told my wife that they would kill me,” Fouad said….

Even though he has been a Christian for twenty years and is married to a Dutch woman, he still gets threatened. Still, he cannot stop evangelizing.

“I receive threats every day. When I post something on Facebook, I often receive hateful reactions,” Fouad said.

Sometimes they call him, sometimes they text him. He has reported the threats to the police several times….

Esther Mulder: ‘My father told me I am no longer his daughter’

Esther Mulder used to be Muslim. In 1992 she fled Somalia together with her family and came to the Netherlands. At the age of fourteen her parents decided to marry her off. Mulder fled the house and lived on the streets for two years, going from one shelter to another. She married a Dutch man and came into contact with the Church through a friend.

She remembers the first time she came to church like it was yesterday: “I immediately felt welcome.”

At the same time, she felt guilty for even being in a church.

“I constantly looked around thinking: ‘What if one of my family members comes in or someone from Somalia?’…

“After my conversion, the threats started. Especially on Facebook. Most of the time they’re coming from other Somalis,” said Mulder. “They write to me in Somali, so no one else is able to understand what they’re saying. We once posted a picture of a Somali conference where everyone was standing in front of a cross. People didn’t like it and we received several threats. I was really sorry about that.”…

Still, it isn’t as it should be: “When I’m there, my father leaves the house,” she said. “The last thing he ever said to me, is that I’m no longer his daughter.”…

Brother Jassim: ‘I went to the police with eight pages full of threats’

Brother Jassim is originally from Morocco. He didn’t want to use his last name.

“My family lives in Morocco and could get in trouble over this,” he said.

He talks about his faith on his website as well as on YouTube. He used to do the same on Facebook until he got blocked. He said it happened because there are people wanting to silence him.

People call him names in public, but it doesn’t bother him. He said he feels freed since his conversion.

“In 2015 I became a Christian. I was baptized on April 24, 2016, on my birthday,” Jassim said…

“My mother taught me to respect everyone and to be kind. That was in stark contrast to what Islam was teaching me. I had to hate and curse Jews and Christians. Muhammed was my big role model, but his life was bad. He killed Jews and married a girl of six. How could he be my role model?”…

“I finally found peace in my heart, and now I’m honestly happy. I’m now also praying for my family members who are Muslim. When I was a Muslim myself, I wasn’t allowed to pray for my Christian partner or for my atheist friend.”

He printed out eight pages full of threats and took these to the police. Still, Jassim keeps on telling people about his faith. “The police advised me to delete my picture from my website. I prayed about it and the Lord told me to keep the picture, ‘for you belong to me.’ It’s strange isn’t it: I’m not doing anything wrong, why would I need to hide? I live in a free country.”

According to Jassim, he gets threatened especially because he is an ex-Muslim. “You’re seen as a heretic.”

Hungarian Government: “Europeans Have a Right to Know About EU’s Secret Plan to Make the UN Migration Compact Mandatory”


Hungarian Government: “Europeans Have a Right to Know About EU’s Secret Plan to Make the UN Migration Compact Mandatory”

 By EMMA R. 13 March 2019

FA recent document by the legal service of the European Commission has “revealed the greatest lie by Brussels”, according to Hungary’s Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó.He claims that the document suggests “secret efforts to make the UN Migration Compact mandatory” in all EU member states.Speaking at a press conference, Szijjártó said that the Hungarian government “calls on the European Commission to stop making secret plans to make the UN compact mandatory and publish all relevant documents completed so far”.He added that the government would call on the EC to report on “any such secret plans” at a foreign affairs council session on March 18.Citizens of the European Union have a right to know “what secret plans the European Commission is making behind their backs to further undermine the continent’s security”, Szijjártó told public Kossuth Radio on Monday.He insisted that it was “well-known” that “Brussels would cram the United Nations’ Migration Compact down the throat of each European country”.He noted that Hungary was the first EU member to reject the document, while 8 other countries followed suit.Before the UN vote on the compact, “Brussels kept pulling the wool over our eyes saying that it would not be legally binding”, Szijjártó said, adding that “still, the word obligation is used 80 times in the document passed”.He insisted that work is under way both in New York and Brussels” to make the compact a point of reference “gradually, through the back door” at the conferences and in documents of international organisations.“They are attempting to do everything possible to make the Compact mandatory for everyone”, he declared.He highlighted the fact that the UN Global Compact for Migration “does nothing other than legalise illegal migration, and according to its definition declare that every country in the world must participate in migration”.He stressed that the Hungarian people have a right to make it clear that they do not want to live in an immigrant country, and that they do not consider migration as a fundamental human right.According to Szijjártó, the endeavour of the European Commission is dangerous, because if the Global Compact for Migration is made mandatory then for instance migrants would have to be provided with the same services as people who live on a country’s territory legally and pay taxes there.“And this would further inspire migration processes, which in turn would increase the threat of terrorism”, he added.

Germany: Researcher blames multiculturalism for rise of Arab gangs and no-go zones in Berlin

Germany: Researcher blames multiculturalism for rise of Arab gangs and no-go zones in Berlin

Another damning report about Muslim migration:

“German Islamic and migration researcher Ralph Ghadban has blamed multicultural ideology for the rise in power of Arab clan gangs, saying there are now no-go zones in Berlin.”

More specifically, it is the Islamic religious ideology and the Leftist tendency to cover for it, along with mass Muslim migration, that have resulted in the rise of “Arab clan gangs” in Germany. Western leaders who have put few, if any, restrictions on immigration, and have chosen to tolerate the intolerable risks to their own citizens, referring to them as “racist” and “Islamophobic” if they protest about what is happening, are to blame for the no-go zones in Berlin and elsewhere.

These “Arab clan gangs” are now “systematically recruiting refugees and building parallel societies in Germany.” According to police reports, this is a partial picture of the parallel societies:

MAR 13, 2019 8:00 AM BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS17 COMMENTS

Another damning report about Muslim migration:

“German Islamic and migration researcher Ralph Ghadban has blamed multicultural ideology for the rise in power of Arab clan gangs, saying there are now no-go zones in Berlin.”

More specifically, it is the Islamic religious ideology and the Leftist tendency to cover for it, along with mass Muslim migration, that have resulted in the rise of “Arab clan gangs” in Germany. Western leaders who have put few, if any, restrictions on immigration, and have chosen to tolerate the intolerable risks to their own citizens, referring to them as “racist” and “Islamophobic” if they protest about what is happening, are to blame for the no-go zones in Berlin and elsewhere.

These “Arab clan gangs” are now “systematically recruiting refugees and building parallel societies in Germany.” According to police reports, this is a partial picture of the parallel societies:

Stuck by tribal and Islamic codes of justice, spurning the state and its laws, resulting in some large families turning into criminal enterprises operating according to their own rules and hierarchies.

These Arab clan gangs are criminal and pose a grave threat to the German people, as well as to police officers who attempt to restore rule of law. A big shout-out to  to Angela Merkel, with her infamous words “we can do this.

“Researcher Blames Multiculturalism for Rise of Arab Clan Gangs in Germany,” Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, March 10, 2019:

German Islamic and migration researcher Ralph Ghadban has blamed multicultural ideology for the rise in power of Arab clan gangs, saying there are now no-go zones in Berlin.

The Lebanese-born researcher claimed that there are now several “no-go areas” in the German capital, listing the areas of Cottbusser Tor, the Tiergarten, and Neukölln, saying they were “dangerous areas, so-called no-go areas, in which Arab clans have the upper hand,” Augsburger Allgemeine reports.

“No-go areas are a law-free area. Policemen are persecuted, besieged, and harassed. Policewomen are groped. They receive threats from clan members such as ‘we know where you live’ or ‘we know where your children go to school’, but they are usually empty threats,” Ghadban said.

Radical Islamic Terrorism Accounts for 91 Percent of European Terror Victims

Radical Islamic Terrorism Accounts for 91 Percent of European Terror Victims

1,433

Swedish
REUTERS

7 Mar 20195952:31

The newly released Black and White Book of Terrorism in Europe has revealed radical Islamic terrorists have accounted for 91 percent of the total terror victims since the year 2000.

The book is an initiative of Spanish MEP Maité Pagazaurtundua, president of the Foundation for Victims of Terrorism, listing the 753 people killed in terror attacks in the European Union between 2000 and 2018, Le Figaro reports.

The report also examines European victims of terror globally, revealing that a further 1,115 people including tourists and military personnel had also been victims of terrorism during the same period.

In total, 91 percent of the victims were killed by radical Islamic extremists, 20 percent of whom were murdered by suicide bombers.

U.S. Commander: ‘Violent Extremists Present a Clear and Present Threat’ to Europe https://t.co/awzQdQudSh
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) March 6, 2019

More Than 1,000 Europeans Murdered, Maimed in Attacks by Islamist Asylum Seekers Since 2014 https://t.co/qmxP2wDkoX
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) June 17, 2018

Former Jihadist Reveals Network Smuggling Islamic Radicals to Europe as Illegal Migrants https://t.co/Ki3hkx8q3U
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) January 10, 2019

Political terror casualties have been far lower, with far-left extremists and far-right extremists each murdering 13 people.

Far-left extremism has been on the rise in several European countries in recent years, with the German domestic intelligence agency BfV warning that violent far-left extremist numbers rose from 7,100 to 9,000 between 2012 and 2017.

The number of far-left extremist crimes also grew by a massive 88 percent during the same period.

In terms of EU countries, Spain has seen the most terror-related deaths, with 268 victims, closely followed by France with 263.

Elisabeth Pelsez, French interministerial delegate for terror victim support, said that the book was not just one of statistics but also one of remembrance for the victims of attacks.

“Forgetfulness is the worst thing,” she said, going on to add, “let’s not forget the physically or psychically injured, about 10 to 20 people for one death.”

The number of terror threats in Europe has also remained high since the height of the migrant crisis in 2015 with French authorities saying last summer that they had prevented at least 5 serious terror attacks that year.

In 2017, Europe faced an estimated 205 separate terror plots according to Europol with 107 of the plots being reported by the United Kingdom.

Soros Foundation Demands EU Ramp Up Pressure on Poland “or EU Won’t Survive”

Soros Foundation Demands EU Ramp Up Pressure on Poland “or EU Won’t Survive”

MAR 4, 2019  BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS5 COMMENTS

Poland is resisting the imposition of chaos, and so the country is being accused by the George Soros Foundation of threatening the entire European Union. The unintelligible arguments of globalists become increasingly unhinged.

the Foundation has worked on projects to “prepare Polish society for reception of refugees”, to “form positive attitudes towards” a mass influx of Middle Eastern migrants, and training tens of thousands of professionals and officials in various roles to fight “prejudice towards minority groups” as well as “hateful online comments”.

Never mind the chaos that has overtaken Sweden, Germany and the UK due to this irresponsible influx of Muslim migrants who have raped innumerable women, committed jihad attacks, intimidated citizens and police alike in violent no-go zones that have spread into once-respectable neighborhoods, and have been responsible for an escalation of anti-Semitism. All this directly related to Muslim migration; the connection of Muslim migration to the rise of anti-Semitism is even acknowledged by Angela Merkel.

Last September, Soros’ Open Society Foundation tried to do to the Hungarian government what it is now doing in Poland, when it took it to court “over legislation that makes it illegal for individuals or organizations to support asylum seekers, claiming the law undermines democracy and establishes a ‘dangerous precedent.’”

“Soros Foundation Demands EU Ramp Up Pressure on Poland ‘or EU Won’t Survive,’” Sputnik News, March 2, 2019:

The Foundation was founded in the 1980s by George Soros, a vocal proponent of globalism and open borders, and is now trying to portray Poland’s drive for sovereignty as a threat to the entire European Union.

The Stefan Batory Foundation, a Polish NGO established by billionaire globalist George Soros and a group of Polish opposition leaders in the 1980s, has issued a paper calling on EU authorities to step up their antagonism towards the ruling party Law and Justice in Poland, saying that the entire survival of the Union depends on it.

“The battle for the rule of law in Poland sets a precedent and is effectively a battle for the survival of the EU”, the document reads, defining the EU as a community in which each member nation’s laws abide to a “similar standard”.

The paper praises the European Commission for its efforts to thwart Polish judicial reforms that Warsaw says aims to overhaul a corrupt and unaccountable system.
The Foundation’s call comes despite a growing frustration with the EU’s interference in internal affairs, which has already resulted in Poland reviewing its legislation to determine whether EU laws are compatible with Polish domestic laws.

In recent years, the Foundation has worked on projects to “prepare Polish society for reception of refugees”, to “form positive attitudes towards” a mass influx of Middle Eastern migrants, and training tens of thousands of professionals and officials in various roles to fight “prejudice towards minority groups” as well as “hateful online comments”.

Poland has adopted a tough anti-migration policy, refusing to take Middle Eastern and North African migrants, which Brussels has tried to force member states to accommodate. Other European nations have followed suit, with Hungary and Austria being among the least willing to accept migrants.

Jacek Czaputowicz, Polish foreign minister, and his Hungarian counterpart, Péter Szijjártó, said during a press conference in Budapest earlier this week that the two nations would continue to defend a Christian, pro-sovereignty Europe in the face of attempts by the Brussels establishment to force mass migration “down nations’ throats”…..

Denmark: One in Five Migrants Say Rape is Woman’s Fault

Denmark: One in Five Migrants Say Rape is Woman’s Fault

 By EMMA R. 1 March 2019

F17 percent of ethnic minority men believe that Danish women who dress provocatively only have themselves to blame when they’re raped, according to a recent survey.Equality Minister Eva Kjer Hansen of the ruling liberal-conservative Venstre Party was astonished that the number is so high.“I get really angry about that. Of course, such attitudes are not acceptable, and it emphasises the need for a debate in society about the values that need to prevail”, Eva Kjer Hansen told Danish Radio.Hansen stressed that parts of the immigrant minority still doesn’t treat men and women as equals.“They still have the attitude that the woman is responsible for child-rearing and the man should always have the last word. There, it is not allowed to have friends from the opposite sex and it is okay for a man to defend his honor with violence”, she said.Last year, another survey discovered that half of those found guilty of rape and attempted rape between January 2016 and May 2017 were immigrants, predominantly from Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iraq and Cameroon.Immigrants and their descendants make up only 12.9 percent of Denmark’s total population.Experts ascribed this over-representation to poor integration and cultural differences.“These perpetrators, not least group rapists, often exhibit contempt for women, whom they accuse of being whores, which can only be exploited. They must not protest, because they go out and offer themselves”, Christian Diesen, a professor emeritus at Stockholm University said, explaining the rapists’ train of thought.“Often, this attitude also reflects in the police questioning, where they behave arrogantly and besmirch the women as much as possible. They feel no remorse and cannot see that they have done anything wrong because it is seen as the women’s own fault”, Diesen explained.Another point of divergence was the issue of homosexuality. One in five migrants (or 22 percent) argued that homosexuality shouldn’t be accepted in society, which clearly contradicts Danish values.

Sharia Netherlands: College Suspends Teacher for Insulting Muhammad

Sharia Netherlands: College Suspends Teacher for Insulting Muhammad

FEB 26, 2019 BY ROBERT SPENCER27 COMMENTS

“You said that Mohammed was married to an eight-year-old girl, and that in the Netherlands a grown man who marries a girl of eight is seen as a pedophile.”

Strictly speaking, the teacher was wrong: Muhammad married Aisha when she was six, and consummated the marriage (i.e., raped her) when she was nine. Hassan’s admission is unusual, as usually Islamic apologists in the West deny that Aisha was nine at all. The principal reason why this matters is because Muhammad is the “excellent example” for Muslims (Qur’an 33:21), to be imitated in all things. And so child marriage, which means the physical and psychological abuse of young girls, is widespread in some areas of the Islamic world.

Turkey’s directorate of religious affairs recently stated that the legal age of girls for marriage was nine. The Diyanet wouldn’t approve of child marriage if it weren’t Islamic, as it explains in its own defense. And child marriage has abundant attestation in Islamic tradition and law.

“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria

“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law

There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married “even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council

“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology

Hadiths that Muslims consider authentic record that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:

“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).

Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).

Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.

In April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.

Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:

The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.

Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”

According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.

“Teacher suspended after ‘insulting prophet,’” translated from “Leerkracht geschorst na ‘beledigen profeet,’” by Ilan Sluis, Telegraaf, February 26, 2019 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

HOOFDDORP – A technology instructor from the Hoofddorp vmbo school the Hoofdvaart College has been suspended for over a month because he offended the prophet Mohammed. Students from the school complained about this to the management. The instructor denies the accusation.

According to the engineering instructor, the accusation followed an incident in the classroom at the end of January. “A pupil told a classmate that her mother finds me ‘haram’, or dirty. I caught that and spoke to her about it. In the break, other students suddenly stood around me and shouted in high tones that I had offended the prophet,” says the instructor, who wants to remain anonymous for privacy reasons.

The disturbance in the corridors of the school was calmed down by the caretaker, but other pupils lodged a complaint with the director of the school. “I do not even teach these students”, says the instructor. The director of the Hoofdvaart College decided to suspend the instructor as a result of the complaint from the fellow students. He has been at home since then.

The director’s suspension letter states what the alleged insult of Prophet Muhammad is about. “You said that Mohammed was married to an eight-year-old girl, and that in the Netherlands a grown man who marries a girl of eight is seen as a pedophile,” it stated.

But the instructor denies having talked about the faith with students at all that day and never made this kind of statement. “I am a Christian myself and I know how important faith is. I respect everyone’s faith and would never say anything offensive about Islam,” he says.

The issue has now escalated to such an extent that the board of directors of the Dunamare Education Group umbrella organization, which includes the Hoofdvaart College, has extended the suspension for a maximum of three months….

Sweden: Muslim Woman in Hijab With Ties to Jihadist Mosque Chosen for Municipality’s Welcome Sign

Sweden: Muslim Woman in Hijab With Ties to Jihadist Mosque Chosen for Municipality’s Welcome Sign

FEB 26, 2019 8:00 AM BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS5 COMMENTS

“A Swedish municipality is facing backlash after selecting a local Muslim woman wearing a headscarf to be the ‘poster girl’ for its roadside ‘welcome’ sign. Her past ties to a controversial local imam were also discovered.”

The intent of featuring the hijabi “poster girl” is to flaunt diversity, no matter what that diversity represents. In this case, “diversity” is represented by Suzan Hindi — who once went by the name Nizam Hindi — wearing a hijab. She has ties to a jihad-preaching mosque. Hindi once “explained how having their own prayer house was good for the Swedish municipality’s Muslim community, how aid from Saudi Arabia and Qatar helped to buy and furnish the building, and how listening to the imam is important during the prayer.”

Would Gävle put up a billboard featuring a Christian holding a cross? Or a Jew wearing a kippah?

Only days ago, Swedish Swimming Federation chairwoman Ulla Gustavsson resigned from her job because of the fallout she suffered after voicing accurately that the veil was a “symbol of repression.”

Sweden is a mess, with no-go zones and sharia patrols. Sweden Democrats party secretary Richard Jomshof “compared the situation in Western Europe in general and Sweden in particular with the late Roman Empire in decline,” and expressed the need for “drastic measures to prevent the continent from falling prey to degeneration and Islamization.” Last year, Swedish Education Minister Gustav Fridolin told the “Hungarian government and ruling Fidesz party to stop using Sweden as an example of failed mass migration policies,” yet it continues to implement the same policies that are rapidly turning it into a failed state.

One must also remember the laughing stock that Sweden’s “first feminist government” made of itself when its members made their walk of shame before Iranian President Rouhani, “wearing Hijabs, Chadors, and long coats.”

“Rage and puzzlement over Muslim woman in hijab chosen for Swedish municipality’s welcome sign,” RT News, February 25, 2019:

A Swedish municipality is facing backlash after selecting a local Muslim woman wearing a headscarf to be the ‘poster girl’ for its roadside ‘welcome’ sign. Her past ties to a controversial local imam were also discovered.

The image of Suzan Hindi, a local Muslim woman in her early 40s wearing a blue headscarf, now welcomes motorists entering Gavle, a coastal municipality in Sweden about 100km north of Stockholm. The photo is occasionally shown on a digital board along with the message: “Welcome to Gavle!”

The municipality said it was a gesture celebrating the diversity of its community, which counts over 100,000 people of various origins and cultures. But some saw it as a signal of support for suppressing women’s freedoms.

“One should think what this is signaling. Some indeed use this garment, the hijab, voluntarily. But not everyone. This a garment that for millions of women around the world represents a lack of freedom,” said Sweden Democrats MP Roger Hedlund, a member of the municipality council, as quoted by the news website Nyheter Idag.

The Sweden Democrats party has an anti-immigration platform and currently holds 62 seats in the 349-seat Swedish parliament. Samhallsnytt, an online publication reportedly close to the party, was quick to dig Hindi’s past ties to a controversial local imam, who was accused of preaching radical ideas and collecting money for terrorists in Iraq and Syria.

Indeed, in 2009 the woman, who called herself Nizam Hindi at the time, was featured in a story by the left-leaning tabloid Arbetarbladet about the opening of a mosque in Gavle. She explained how having their own prayer house was good for the Swedish municipality’s Muslim community, how aid from Saudi Arabia and Qatar helped to buy and furnish the building, and how listening to the imam is important during the prayer.

The Al-rashideen mosque and its imam, Abu Raad, were involved in a scandal a few years ago, after the leading local newspaper Gefle Dagblad accused him of spreading radical Salafist ideas and collecting money for terrorist groups in Syria and Iraq….